There is no doubt that
social media has forever changed the way we share and view information with
other people. Scholarly people are
predicting that 2012 will be the year that separates the winners from the
losers, I’m not talking about your friends of course, I’m talking about the
social sites that we all use. David
Catalano, president and co-founder of Modea Corp., a digital advertisement
agency in Virginia says that “Facebook is like scrapbooking for your life.” Users establish virtual identities on sites
like Google+ and Facebook. What you
choose to post on your page either in the form of a comment or of a certain “like”
is really a form of advertising yourself to your community.
Changes in these platforms
are making it easier for the user to express what they really feel about a
brand, service, etc. Marketers will be
able to target consumers better because of the more in depth categorizing system.
I was reading an article
written by Danielle Monroe called Google+ vs. Facebook and it talks about the
future of advertising and how it ties in to social sites like Google+ and
Facebook. In her article she talks about
what kind of pressure is being put on brands to produce content that people
want. Google+ is planning to modernize
the way users search for content. It
will show search results according to the brands that have the most
followers. But are users ready for a
social site that is also a search engine?
When you compare Facebook
and Google+ you might find some important differences that will help up predict
the future of these two sites. Facebook
puts the users experience up front as the most important aspect of the site,
advertising and making money is secondary to a good experience. I like this business plan, it still makes
more money then I’ll ever see in a lifetime but it is set up to give me a good
experience without pushing the advertising on me. With the new “verbs” it will help marketers
gather more information without actually asking for it, it will be information
we supply ourselves without even realizing what we are doing, but in a good
way, not underhanded or misleading.
Google+ seems to be trying
to make money as their first priority; the user experience is secondary which
might just get them a “thumbs down” and a much smaller “piece of the social pie”
so to speak. Well, I’m looking forward
to seeing how social networking changes in the next year. People are not going to put up with a
platform that is annoying, confusing, or overcrowded.
I think the U.S. government
should have a social site. They should
get our opinions on running the country.
Election Day is not enough, we should be friends with our elected
officials and we should know what they are up to. Nice idea but it will never happen; too many
people would just scream and make stupid comments.
Anyway, sites need to stay relevant to their
audiences and marketers need to know how to market to their intended customers.
So developers beware! If people start leaving, many will follow and
it’s a BIG Internet so do your best to hold onto your subscribers, you need
them…or should I say us.
MONROE, DANIELLE. "Google+ Vs. Facebook." Econtent
34.10 (2011): 8-9. Education Research Complete. Web. 3 Mar. 2012.
No comments:
Post a Comment